In my March 25th post, "Something Different", I wrote about my experiment in writing as a business and my aim to pen a 30 000 word novella in a whole new genre based on popular fiction in three weeks. There was more to my motivation than just the desire to do something different. That motivation came from a relatively lucrative assignment with a rigid deadline that gave me four weeks to complete the assignment. That assignment was part of the launch for Amazon's new publishing platform, Kindle Worlds. Kindle Worlds is the first commercial publishing platform that will enable an writer to create fan fiction based on a wide range of original stories and characters and earn royalties for doing so.
In a press release today Amazon Publishing announced that it "has secured licenses from Warner Bros. Television Group's Alloy Entertainment division for its New York Times best-selling book series Gossip Girl, by Cecily von Ziegesar; Pretty Little Liars by Sara Shepard; and Vampire Diaries, by L.J. Smith; and plans to announce more licenses soon. Through these licenses, Kindle Worlds will allow any writer to publish authorized stories inspired by these popular worlds and will make them available for readers to purchase in the Kindle Store....Beginning today, interested writers are encouraged to visit Kindle Worlds (www.amazon.com/kindleworlds) to learn more and get a head start on writing. In June, the Kindle Worlds store is expected to launch with over 50 commisioned works from authors such as #1 New York Times best-selling author Barbara Freethy, Bram Stoker Award -winner John Everson and RITA award winner Colleen Thompson. At that time, the Kindle Worlds self-service submission platform, where any writer can submit completed work, will also open."
In response to my blog post, "Something Different", William Doonan commented, "I'm eager to hear/read the results of your experiment." Well I'm happy to announce that in June, with the official launch of Kindle Worlds, you will be able to see, read and I know you'll enjoy the results of my experiment: a 35 000 word novella written in three weeks in the Pretty Little Liars universe.
I am pretty psyched about this new non-traditional publishing platform as it gives authors greater access to getting their work published. To learn more about this platform and how you can submit a completed manuscript go to www.amazon.com/kindleworlds, or Kindle Worlds for authors. I would love to hear your take on this new publishing platform.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
The Art of Choosing Cover Art (and a Giveaway!)
Self-publishing has become easy and viable for many authors.
Even mid-list and best-selling authors are self-publishing either new books or
books from their backlist. Choosing cover art, which is something most of us have
little experience in, is suddenly a crucial decision we have to make. In the
midst of all the other new techniques we have to learn it can be more than a
bit intimidating, but it doesn’t have to be. Ideally you’ll want to hire a
graphic designer, but finances being what they are that might not be possible.
With a little practice you can design your own covers. Here are a few tips to
help you on the way.
Once I’ve written a synopsis and have a fairly good idea of
the story, I start searching the stock photo sites for images I think will work
for a cover. There are a lot of stock photo sites out there. Some of them are
insanely expensive, while others are reasonably priced. The most I’ve ever paid
for a cover photo is $70, but most are somewhere around $30. If your cover will
be figural it’s a good idea to find photos that look as close to your characters
as possible. Obviously, if you’re self-publishing you can base your characters
on the photo. Even when I traditionally publish, I attach any stock photos I
like with the art form from the publisher. It’s a bit of a crapshoot, but
they’ve used it more than once, and it certainly can’t hurt. A lot of writers
use celebrity photos for inspiration, but to me, stock photos make more sense
as you can actually use those pictures if need be. If you’re working with an
artist, keep in mind when looking at the pictures that a good cover artist can
change such things as hair and eye color, and even skin color within a certain
range. Tattoos can be added or removed (though I understand removing can be a
bit of a pain). It’s more important to convey the proper mood and concept of
the story than to have exact representations of your characters.
Size: The vendor sites are requiring absolutely
huge files these days, but you also must keep in mind that the first time a
reader sees your cover it might literally be the size of a postage stamp. That
being the case, it’s a good idea to use clear, crisp images. Highly cluttered
images don’t read well, especially when reduced down to microscopic sizes. I
always open a picture in Photoshop and look at it as small as possible to get a
good idea of how it will look on the vendor site.
Orientation: This
would seem to be a no-brainer, but I’ve seen some covers made with horizontal
images. This just looks…wrong. Most of the stock sites will let you search with
a filter for orientation. This limits the frustration of finding the perfect
image with the wrong orientation. A good artist can do some cropping, but it’s
best (and cheaper) to start with a good image to begin with.
Color: This is just a personal observation, but dark
colors don’t seem to “read” as well on the vendor site as brighter colors.
Obviously, if your book is a dark police procedural with serial killers and
whatnot you’re probably not going to go with bright pinks and yellows, but you
might want to add some lighter colors so the image “pops” more visually.
Fonts: Some beginners make major mistakes as it
pertains to fonts. There are a lot of fonts out there and it’s easy to get
caught up in all types of funky designs and special effects. That is not a good
idea. It looks amateurish and it’s unreadable when your cover is the size of a
postage stamp. Stick to one or two crisp and easy to read fonts. If you’re
going to have two fonts on a cover they should be opposites, for instance, a
nice traditional serif font with a script font is usually a safe bet.
These tips should help you calm any qualms you have about
choosing a cover that’s perfect for the book you’ve worked so hard on.
***
Roslyn Hardy Holcomb is the author of the best-selling novel Rock Star. Her most recent books are: Hot for Teacher, Dark Star and Pussycat Death Squad The Lion in Russia. She grew up in North Alabama and currently lives in the Atlanta area with her husband and two young sons.
Leave a comment below for your chance to win a copy of Roslyn's most recent book, Pussycat Death Squad The Lion in Russia.
Friday, May 17, 2013
Guest author Julie Luek: What's your writing personality?
![]() |
| Julie Luek |
For over twenty years I worked in the field of higher education, much of that time spent working as a career counselor. One of the ways I helped students discover their major and career choice was by administering a personality inventory called the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). It’s based on the theories of Carl Jung, famed psychologist who believed, in short, that there were temperaments or “types” of personalities. The idea for students, of course, was if they could identify their personality preferences and learn to apply it to evaluating job functions, the fit might be better for both parties.
As I’ve ventured into the world of writing, I’m brought back to this inventory and have reflected on how it might relate to my writing style. Although in consideration of space, this is a very short and non-scientific look at the application, it provides an interesting angle on our writing personality.
The Types
Extrovert (E)—Have an external focus and energy source. They like to talk their ideas out loud and will process as they do. They are stimulated by their external environment—for example, music may energize them and writer’s groups are wonderful for processing.
Introvert (I)—Have an internal focus and energy source. They can get lost inside their own heads with little need to verbally process. They tend to like quiet and find external stimulation distracting. While not always loners, their need for socialization is more limited than their extroverted counterparts.
Sensing (S)—Into the details: the who, what, where, when and whys of things. They often enjoy precision and research and are exacting in their attention to details.
Intuitive (N)—Into the big picture. They love brainstorming and ideas. They are dreamers, but have a more difficult time and find it more tedious to get down to the “brass tacks” of an idea.
Feeling (F)—Make decisions through their heart. The first question they often ask is how do I feel about my choices? How will it influence others? Is it a kind/merciful decision? They lead with their hearts and may process decisions based on emotions.
Thinking (T)—Make decisions through their heads (even though they are aware of feelings) and ask questions like, does it make sense? What are the consequences? Is it just? Decisions, and even relationships, may be filtered through their sense of logic first.
Judging (J)—Enjoy a planned, organized lifestyle. High amounts of loose ends and unplanned interruptions will disrupt a judger’s sense of calm. They’re great with checklists and love the sense of completion of getting a task crossed off. Deadlines and a clean, organized workspace are comforting.
Perceiving (P)—Enjoy a more fluid, open-ended lifestyle. Although messes aren’t ideal, a sloppy desk isn’t a reason to panic; a Perceiver knows where everything is. Perceivers are more flexible with interruptions and have a higher need for variety. They’d love to be more organized and appreciate the need; they just seldom are.
In the theory of the MBTI, you would choose one type/letter from each of the four categories and this becomes your personality “type”.
What Does It Mean?
For me, being an INFJ means I can work, and in fact prefer to work, for hours in complete silence—only the hum of the refrigerator to keep me company. I love solitude and don’t crave writers’ groups, even though I know they are good for me. I love to brainstorm ideas in my own head and have a tougher time with the details, especially those pesky grammar details. I lead with my heart—I love to converse and relate to readers on a heart level. Despite my aversion to details, I crave organization. I keep bulletin boards with organized projects, a list of due dates for articles and love a sense of completion when I submit a piece. I can’t stand a cluttered work desk—it makes me nervous. The downside is I tend to sometimes get overwhelmed if there are too many due dates or open-ended projects on my to-do list.
Looking at this list, how would you describe your writing personality? Does this help shed light on your style? Are you a planner or a pantser? What does your work space look like?
For more information on the MBTI, visit here.
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Tips for living with a writer? A list, deconstructed.
A few weeks ago, I was reading my Facebook news feed when I came across a graphic posted by one of my friends, offering yet another "Top 10" writing advice list. Its title? “How to Survive a Relationship with a Writer: Top 10 Tips.” The graphic offered no author for the list, but a website was cited at the bottom: Writers Write.
Graphics such as this often are played at least to some extent for the humor, with some tidbits of truth and/or wisdom thrown in to anchor the whole thing. I went through the list, conjuring memories or pet peeves that matched up with the “tips” listed, or things my wife, kids and friends have to endure as they tolerate the writer in their midst. So, I decided to post each of the infonuggets here, along with my take on them:
- Never ask when the book will be published.
This one makes no sense to me. I love when somebody asks me this question. It (usually) means they’re interested in what I’m doing. I’m always telling people when my next book will be out and I keep a running “monthly wrap-up” on my blog, detailing the progress of every project I have in the hopper. My regular readers appreciate these updates, and they know they can ask me about the status of a given project at any time. What can I say? I’m an attention-whore. - Do not ask a writer if they wish they had written the latest best-seller.
I’ve never gotten this question, but 1) All writers wish they had a best-seller, and 2) It depends on the book in question. I’m okay with not having written Fifty Shades of Grey, for example, but I wouldn’t mind writing something like Darth Vader and Son. - Never say you’re thinking of writing a book. Never ever say you’d also write a book if only you had the time.
Okay, this one can bug me on occasion, mostly because it’s probably the one statement I’ve heard the most over the years. I frequently get asked some variation of, “How do I become a writer?” The most fervent askers of such questions don’t seem to like hearing that to be a writer, you have to...you know...write. - Don’t call the police if you happen to see a writer’s browsing history. The average writer is not planning to poison you, hire a hitman, or move to Afghanistan. It’s simply research.
This, of course, is what we want you to think. - Leave the writer alone when the writer is actually writing. You have no idea how difficult it is to enter “the zone.”
I agree with this one, for the most part. When I’m in my home office and the door is closed, that’s the universal signal for “Writer at Work.” Family and friends know that they open said door at their peril. You’ll know when I’m on a crash deadline, as I’ll have enabled the office’s protective guillotine and laser grid features. - Don’t pick unfair fights with a writer. Writers do get their revenge in print.
And the dumber the fight or argument, the more painful your fictional namesake’s demise. For example: If you want to argue with me over how much you think the latest Star Trek film sucks, I’m sending you and your hovercar over the cliff on some winding Martian mountain road. Political discussions usually mean I’m going to make you the main course for a horde of zombies. Your mileage may vary. - If you do want to fight, make it memorable. The writer is always looking for material.
I actually did craft an exchange of dialogue in one novel based on a string of comments from a Facebook discussion. Some of the more memorable conversations and/or arguments definitely make good fodder. However, no one from the original discussion died in the resulting book. - If your writer wanders off at a party, don’t panic. Writers love to inspect the host’s bookshelves and medicine cabinets.
I can honestly say I don’t peek into cabinets or drawers in other people’s homes or offices. That’s just rude, but I do peruse your movie collection, if for no other reason than to see if you’re bold enough to display your porn alongside the mainstream titles. I’ll also definitely be checking out your bookshelves...mostly to see if any of my books are there, and I then judge you accordingly. - Buy your writer notebooks and cute pens as gifts. Do not buy flowers. Chocolate is also acceptable.
I’m not much of a flower person, but I imagine at least someone out there would appreciate the thought. I’m okay with notebooks, but feel free to substitute “vodka” where it says “cute pens.” In fact, sub it for “notebooks,” too. On the other hand, the chocolate is always welcome. - Leave your writer alone when a rejection letter arrives. After the deadly silence, screaming, crying, moaning and muttering have subsided, offer your writer a cup of coffee or tea. And a cupcake. Add a huge hug.
I know no writer who gets that worked up over a rejection. It happens to all of us, and it’s just part of the game, right? Personally, I shrug it off, see if there’s anything in the rejection letter I can use to improve the story I submitted, and then I move on. This goes double for bad reviews, which we all get, too. Stuff happens, but feel free to send along the cupcakes. They can’t hurt.
Monday, May 13, 2013
Ye Olde Bait-and-Switch
by
Sunny Frazier
I'll
admit it—I'm a sucker for a good headline. The ones on the tabloids
are so outrageous that I can't stop myself from reading them while
standing in the check-out line. I love a good pun in a book title (my
next is A Snitch In Time). I want to be teased, tempted, tantalized.
What I don't want is to be tricked.
I
subscribe to a lot of industry-type blogs for information. I don't
tweet, but there are people online who send out Twitter feeds and do
the hard work for me. And yes, I'm suckered into opening these URLs
because I can't help myself. I'm always looking for that Holy Grail
of info that will reveal all the secrets of publishing and selling.
Move over, Dan Brown!
I'm
especially prone to anything with a number cited:
4
tips for completing your manuscript (oh, please help me!)
25
Ways To Be A Happy Writer (you mean I don't have to be
depressed?)
12
Ideas for Email Updates That You'll Actually Enjoy Writing (email
can be fun???)
Break
it down in simple steps for me. This is what I'm looking for. Except,
it's not.
When
I open up these blogs, more often than not I find old news re-hashed.
All the poster has done is slap a new title on stuff we already know.
It seems the writer invested more time in coming up with a catchy
title rather than content. I feel cheated. No, I feel used. I was
looking for a new insight and all I got was generic information.
Fool
me once, shame on me. Fool me twice and I don't trust you anymore. I
won't be lured to your blog again. Go ahead, dangle all the enticing
titles at me that you can come up with. I won't take the bait.
I've
decided to steal the premise of these blogs and do what the
originator was too lazy to do—stretch my brain and come up with
fresh info. You want to know “7 Odd Places to Sell Books?” Okay,
here you go: Funerals. Coffee shops. Flower shops. Stationary stores.
Social Security Office. Hospitals. Insurance offices. Yep, I've sold
my books to all these places and I can tell you how I did it. I'm not
one to make promises I can't keep.
I
know many of these disappointing pieces are written because bloggers
need to fill space. But, I don't have time for blather. Neither do
any of you. Instead, make it a practice not to just read and absorb
but read and riff off the unfinished idea. At least you'll get
something productive in the end.
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Great Beginnings
"Fury on Soufriere Hills," the fourth novel in the Caribbean Adventure Series, is finished, sort of. Although I have worked out most of the
kinks, developed my characters, created and resolved tensions, I am still
struggling with the most important part of a middle grade novel, the beginning.
While youngsters are more tolerant of flights of fantasy
than adults might be, they are less likely to keep reading a book that does not
grab them immediately. The main comment that I got from the critique group I
attended a few weeks ago was that the action started too late, page 8 for
goodness sake, definitely too late for a middle grade novel. I consulted with
my local experts (aka my children) and they concurred. My son, an avid reader,
mentioned that his friends disliked some of the books he loved and especially
the ones that had a slow start. He was willing to stick with them, but many of
his friends were not.
He suggested an alternate beginning. In this one, the action
started on the first page, with Mark, the main character tumbling down a hill
into a … wait a minute, you’ll have to read the book to find that out. Mark
would then gripe about how he had found himself in this predicament, thus
giving me an opportunity to go back a little in time and create the setting. I wrote it this way and sent it off to my first level of readers.
“I thought that this paragraph was here by mistake,” was the
response to the very opening of the book. Clearly this did not work the way
that I had done it. It is a great idea, but I had so much background to cover
that there was too much (those pesky 8 pages) between the fast paced beginning
and the resumption of the action.
So I am now on the fifth version (I can count, just did not
want to bore you with each revision) of this opening and I think that I finally
have the right balance. I hope you will too, when this book is finally
published.
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Flash Fiction
Still reeling from the disappointing results of my ebook experiment, I entered a period of depression, followed by a period of heavy drinking, and culminating with alternating bouts of anger, self-loathing, and giggling. It was a rough time, I won’t lie, but it only lasted about an hour, and I’m over it now.
I’m not going to give up. In fact, as long as people refuse to read my work, I’m going to keep writing. That’s what it’s all about, I’ve decided. So I’m revisiting one of my first loves, Samantha Horowitz of Paramus, New Jersey, for the hell of it. And then I’m revisiting another of my first loves; flash fiction.
I can’t write poetry, but I can write brief stories. What I like the most about flash fiction is that it forces you to be creative in a limited space. It’s like painting a sunset with only two colors, and not the colors you want.
The storyteller John Daniel crafts massive little stories with only 99 words. I can’t do that. I need 150-250. But with 150 words, you can make a story out of nearly anything, like this:
HOW TO BUY VODKA IN A RECESSION
“I don’t have a lot of money,” I told the liquor store clerk. He knows me; we go way back. “But that doesn’t mean I’m willing to sacrifice on quality.”
“How much do you have?”
I held up a handful of coins. “$2.34”
He reached for a miniature bottle of Smirnoff. “This is the best I can do.”
“No.” I shook my head. “It’s really too small. What else do you have?”
“Nothing, nothing at all, except,…no.”
“What?”
He sighed and pulled a liter bottle from under the counter. The label was Russian. “I don’t know if you’re ready. It’s made from turnips.”
“What’s it like?”
“It’s a low-born vodka, sullen with a harrowing finish. It’s the kind of tipple you’d want along on a cold November morning if you were stripping wallpaper in Minsk.”
“How much?”
“$1.17.”
I did the math. “I’ll take two.”
If you’d like to read more, consider investing 99¢ and picking up a copy of The Mummies of Blogspace9. It’s been called “original,” “evocative,” “mind-blowing,” “far-reaching in scope,” and “genre-bending,” all by me. This could well be the best 99¢ you spend all day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



